The Physics of Organisational Behaviour

Why organisations behave the way they do — and why leaders must think like engineers, not motivators

Most leaders try to understand behaviour through psychology or culture. But organisations behave far more like physical systems than emotional ones.

They follow laws of:

  • load

  • friction

  • flow

  • resistance

  • drift

  • structural integrity

When leaders understand these forces, behaviour stops looking mysterious. It becomes predictable — and fixable.

 

1. Load: Every system has a maximum capacity

In physics, every structure can only hold so much load before it bends, cracks, or collapses.

Organisations are the same.

When load is too high:

  • people slow down

  • errors increase

  • decisions stall

  • communication breaks down

  • readiness collapses

This isn’t about motivation. It’s physics.

Real example: A practice manager drowning in “just one more thing”

A clinic kept adding small tasks:

  • new reporting

  • new compliance checks

  • new forms

  • new KPIs

Each one seemed minor. But together, they exceeded the system’s load.

The result?

  • delays

  • frustration

  • rework

  • staff turnover

The system wasn’t resistant — it was overloaded.

 

2. Friction: Small inefficiencies multiply under pressure

In physics, friction slows movement and increases energy consumption.

In organisations, friction looks like:

  • unclear processes

  • missing information

  • duplicated work

  • inconsistent decisions

  • unnecessary approvals

Friction consumes readiness.

Real example: A hospital where every shift starts 10 minutes late

Not because staff are lazy — but because:

  • computers take too long to log in

  • handover is inconsistent

  • equipment isn’t where it should be

Ten minutes of friction × 3 shifts × 7 days × 200 staff = thousands of hours lost.

Friction is a structural problem, not a people problem.

 

3. Flow: Work moves best through clear pathways

In physics, flow is about how smoothly energy or material moves through a system.

In organisations, flow is about:

  • how decisions move

  • how information moves

  • how work moves

When flow is blocked, everything slows.

Real example: A tech team waiting days for decisions

Developers were highly skilled and motivated. But decisions sat in inboxes for days.

Flow was blocked.

The team wasn’t slow — the system was.

 

4. Resistance: Systems push back when energy is applied too quickly

In physics, resistance increases when you apply force too fast.

Organisations behave the same way.

When leaders push change too quickly:

  • people push back

  • confusion increases

  • errors rise

  • trust drops

This isn’t emotional resistance — it’s structural resistance.

Real example: A retail chain rolling out a new POS system overnight

The rollout was fast. The resistance was immediate.

Not because staff didn’t want it — but because:

  • training was rushed

  • load was high

  • routines were unstable

The system resisted the force.

 

5. Drift: Systems naturally move out of alignment over time

In physics, drift is the gradual movement away from a stable position.

In organisations, drift shows up as:

  • inconsistent practices

  • workarounds

  • mixed messages

  • unclear priorities

  • local variations

Drift is normal — but dangerous if unmanaged.

Real example: A government team whose processes varied by team

Every team had its own version of the “standard process.” Not because they were rebellious — but because drift accumulated over time.

Drift reduces readiness unless leaders actively correct it.

 

6. Structural Integrity: Systems fail when the underlying architecture is weak

In physics, structural integrity determines whether a system can hold shape under pressure.

In organisations, structural integrity comes from:

  • clear priorities

  • stable routines

  • predictable decisions

  • manageable load

  • coherent signals

When these weaken, the organisation becomes fragile.

Real example: A school that collapsed under a new curriculum

The curriculum wasn’t the problem. The structure was:

  • too many initiatives

  • too much load

  • too little clarity

  • too much drift

The system lacked structural integrity.

 

Practical takeaways leaders can use immediately

1. Diagnose load before diagnosing behaviour

Ask: “Is this a motivation issue or a load issue?” It’s almost always load.

 

2. Remove friction before adding effort

Fix the system, not the people.

 

3. Improve flow by clarifying decision pathways

Slow decisions are a structural failure, not a leadership failure.

 

4. Introduce change at a pace the system can absorb

Force creates resistance. Support creates movement.

 

5. Actively correct drift

Small misalignments become big problems if ignored.

 

6. Strengthen structural integrity before increasing pressure

A strong system can handle load. A weak system collapses under it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *